From Cambridge, England, on Sunday Morning: 1

I’ve always claimed that culture is an infinity of porous membranes, that ideas and sentences fly this way and that, being absorbed (or rejected) in this time or that, in this place or that.  That’s a model I’ve liked, but I’ve just experienced it at work in a surprising way.  Words I wrote in Syracuse some time ago somehow traveled to a  Unitarian Fellowship in Cambridge, UK, as center pieces for discussion.  And then were sent aloft again to Hod HaSharon, Israel.  A lot of dispersed porous membranes had to be in play for those flights and absorptions to have occurred.

One can forget exactly what one has written with surprising ease, the flip side of which is that one can read what one has written with fresh eyes and ears as if the ideas were from someone else.  In any case, if you were in Cambridge this Sunday you could have been pondering this:

Ortega calls his Meditations on Quixote “essays in Intellectual love.” As he puts it “[these essays] . . . have no informative value whatever, they are not summaries, either – they are rather what a humanist of the seventeenth century would have called salvations.” But what can we, of the twenty-first century, make of the idea that essays can be salvations? Ortega writes that a salvation – for example, his salvations of Don Quixote – will take up “a man, a book, a picture, a landscape, an error, a sorrow and then seek to carry it by the shortest route to its fullest significance.”

          We should expect, then, that some essays are expressions of love, a kind of preservative love, a love that cares for persons and things and gives them life. Such essays can carry out a generous, even pious criticism or elaboration that brings a theme or person or object to its next and fuller meaning. Without such attentive care, fields of significance we now take for granted fall into disuse, decay. Like ill-treated living things, they slowly die, or stay fallow, awaiting summer’s rain and seeding. Texts or paintings, trees or figures from our past, can carry undiscovered plenitudes. The artful critic, like the curator of invaluable archives or someone husbanding objects of great cultural worth, can bring that plenitude out and into life, saving it from extinction or from an only paltry half-life.


From Lost Intimacy in American Thought: Recovering Personal Philosophy from Thoreau to Cavell,  Edward F.Mooney (Continuum, 2009, p. 3).


One comment on “From Cambridge, England, on Sunday Morning: 1

  1. dmf says:

    perhaps the pivotal point of unbinding for the dying ‘mainline’ churches (and voluntary organizations/associations writ large) here in the US is that in our highly commercialized and mobile times there is no-thing (no Author-ity) that holds sway over individuals other than their own personal preferences, and perhaps if they could learn to attend to the kinds of callings I think that you are foregrounding here there could be some hope for common projects if not common grounds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s